Service

Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) Scoping

Quantifying carbon sequestration, biodiversity, and livelihood co-benefits to design investable NbS portfolios for European institutional investors.

0
Hectares Potential
0
Mt COโ‚‚e Sequestration
0
Ecosystem Types
0
Year Horizon

Client: Anonymous European Investment Fund

Institutional impact fund seeking nature-based investment pipeline | EU Taxonomy-aligned | 2023โ€“2024

Challenge

From Theory to Investable NbS Pipeline

The investment fund needed a pipeline of quantifiable, verifiable NbS projects across multiple geographies and ecosystem types, with robust carbon and biodiversity co-benefit estimates aligned with IPCC AR6.

Our client required a systematic scoping framework to assess NbS potential across 12,500 hectares of degraded and under-managed land in Southeast Asia and East Africa. The portfolio needed to deliver measurable carbon sequestration alongside biodiversity restoration and community livelihood co-benefits.

We applied the Seddon et al. (2020) global NbS evidence synthesis[1] and Griscom et al.'s (2017) natural climate solutions framework[2] to quantify sequestration potential across 8 ecosystem types.

๐ŸŒ

Key Constraints

โ€ข Need for EU Taxonomy-aligned DNSH screening
โ€ข IPCC AR6 emission factor requirements
โ€ข IUCN Red List biodiversity safeguards
โ€ข Community FPIC and livelihood transition planning

Methodology

A Six-Phase NbS Scoping Framework

Our methodology integrates ecosystem science, climate finance, and community engagement into a single investment-ready pipeline.

1. Ecosystem Assessment โ†’ 2. Baseline Quantification โ†’ 3. NbS Intervention Design โ†’ 4. Co-Benefit Estimation โ†’ 5. Financial Model โ†’ 6. Monitoring Plan
๐Ÿ”ฌ

Ecosystem Assessment

Field-validated remote sensing assessment of 8 ecosystem types across 12,500 ha using Sentinel-2 and Planet imagery.

๐Ÿ“Š

Baseline Quantification

Carbon stock baseline calculated using IPCC AR6 Tier 2 emission factors and national forest inventory data.

๐ŸŒฑ

NbS Intervention Design

Designed site-specific interventions: assisted natural regeneration, agroforestry, mangrove restoration, and peatland rewetting.

๐Ÿฆ‹

Co-Benefit Estimation

Biodiversity co-benefits modeled using IUCN Red List habitat suitability indices and landscape connectivity metrics.

๐Ÿ’ฐ

Financial Model

15-year project finance model with carbon credit revenue, blended finance structures, and sensitivity analysis.

๐Ÿ“ก

Monitoring Plan

Remote sensing + field inventory monitoring protocol aligned with VCS VM0047 and Gold Standard requirements.

IPCC AR6 UNEP WCMC IUCN Red List FAO FRA 2020
๐ŸŒณ
Lowland Forest

3,200 ha

๐Ÿ”๏ธ
Montane Forest

2,100 ha

๐ŸŒพ
Peatland

1,800 ha

๐ŸŒŠ
Mangrove

1,500 ha

๐ŸŒฟ
Grassland

1,400 ha

๐ŸŒด
Agroforestry

1,200 ha

๐Ÿ’ง
Wetland

900 ha

๐ŸŒต
Dryland

400 ha

Data & Visualization

NbS Potential & Opportunity Mapping

NbS Potential Assessment: 5-Dimensional Radar

Global NbS Opportunity Zones

Results

Investment-Ready Pipeline

0
Hectares Potential
0
Mt COโ‚‚e Potential
0
Ecosystem Types
0
Year Horizon
๐ŸŒฑ

Sequestration Potential

4.2 Mt COโ‚‚e over 15 years at an average rate of 22.4 tCOโ‚‚e/ha/year across the portfolio.

๐Ÿฆ‹

Biodiversity Gains

Projected 18% increase in habitat suitability for 12 IUCN Red List species across restored landscapes.

๐Ÿ“ˆ

Financial Returns

Projected IRR of 8.4% under base-case carbon price ($35/tCOโ‚‚e) with downside protection at $15/tCOโ‚‚e.

Project Timeline

Q1 2023

Ecosystem assessment and remote sensing baseline across 8 ecosystem types.

Q2 2023

Field validation and community FPIC consultations; carbon stock inventories.

Q3 2023

NbS intervention design and co-benefit modeling; biodiversity connectivity analysis.

Q4 2023

Financial model and sensitivity analysis; 15-year project structure finalized.

Q1 2024

Monitoring protocol designed; pipeline presented to investment committee.

Academic Foundation

Peer-Reviewed NbS Evidence Base

Seddon, P.J. et al. (2020) Global recognition of the importance of nature-based solutions to climate change. Global Change Biology, 26(11), 6125โ€“6127. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15881
Griscom, B.W. et al. (2017) Natural climate solutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(44), 11645โ€“11650. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1710465114
Cohen-Shacham, E. et al. (2016) Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges. IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management, Gland, Switzerland. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.en
Chausson, A. et al. (2020) Mapping the effectiveness of nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation. Global Change Biology, 26(11), 6134โ€“6155. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15310